How to deal with bullying in school

NEW YORK, NY – FEBRUARY 04: A student holds a sign at a New York City public school that reads ‘no hate’ during a protest outside a Donald Trump rally in New York, New York.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images) NEW YORK (CBSNewYork/AP) – The Trump campaign has been making its case for his presidential candidacy since the start of the year, even if its been more subtle than in the past.

But it has yet to make the argument that Trump would be an effective president.

That’s a problem that the Trump campaign hopes to rectify.

The campaign is spending tens of millions of dollars on a media blitz across the country in hopes of pushing the narrative that the president is a racist and sexist, and that Hillary Clinton is a supporter of mass incarceration and a proponent of mass deportations.

The campaign is even planning a trip to the states for events and rallies that will be held before the November election.

The goal is to paint Trump as a racist, sexist, xenophobic, misogynist and anti-Semitic.

That is an argument that is already making its way through the political mainstream.

And that narrative has made it into the mainstream, particularly in the form of the book “The People vs. The Hillary Clinton Crime Machine,” written by the right-wing website Breitbart News.

The book is based on interviews with former Hillary Clinton campaign staffers, as well as a former White House official, who are all willing to speak on the record for the book.

In an excerpt, the official says that Clinton was a champion of mass incarcerations and mass deportions, while Trump wants to deport as many as 10 million immigrants.

The Breitbart News excerpt is based largely on an email exchange between a former aide to Trump and a Republican consultant, in which the former aide says that Trump was going to try to get Clinton to support mass deportation.

In that email, the former adviser asks the adviser to explain the difference between the positions of the Trump administration and Clinton’s.

The aide replies, “The difference between Clinton and Trump is that they were the ones who were going to do it.

The difference between Trump and Trump, is that Trump said that he was going in the direction of mass deportation.

That’s the one position that they would go in.”

The adviser responds, “Yeah, it is, because if you’re going to say you are going to deport 10 million people and you are not going to let any other country have them, then you are doing something illegal.

That does not make sense.”

In an email to CBS News, a senior Trump campaign official said the Trump and Clinton campaigns were “working together to address the growing problem of anti-Semitism in our nation.”

“We will continue to work with allies across the aisle to make sure this message reaches the American people,” the official added.

The Trump official also said that the campaign would be spending “a lot of time with Jewish voters” in their states, but declined to provide further details about how.

The senior Trump official added that the new book would be released by the end of the month.

But some of the statements made in the Breitbart News article, which have since been deleted, have raised eyebrows.

In one email, former adviser to Trump, Steve Bannon, says, “I will make sure you are on the front page of the New York Times and in the Washington Post and on the radio and TV.”

In another email, Bannon says, “[Hillary] Clinton’s been out there talking about mass deportments and mass incarceration, and she’s been saying this for a long time.

We’re going back to mass incarceration.”

In a statement, Breitbart News wrote, “Donald Trump is a vile racist, and he is not interested in taking on the people who voted for him.”

“This is the new reality in American politics.

Hillary Clinton’s record is one of mass murder and mass imprisonment, and it is precisely those policies that Donald Trump has advocated for for decades,” the statement continued.

“He was once one of the most enthusiastic supporters of mass immigration.

But after the Clinton crime wave, he abandoned his previous support of mass migration and has now taken on the role of mass mass deportator.”

This story has been updated to include comments from the Trump official.

Which new schools in New York are making students more likely to leave for greener pastures?

By Jennifer HsuFor nearly a decade, the school system in New Jersey has been grappling with the same dilemma that nearly every other school system faces: a steep decline in enrollment.

New Jersey’s public school enrollment declined by about 3,000 students from 2005 to 2014.

At the same time, the number of students in the system increased by 3,300 students, according to the latest data.

At Liberty High School in Edison, students in 2016 had an average SAT score of 1680, which was the second-highest among the state’s public high schools.

By contrast, the average SAT scores for students in New Brunswick, New Jersey, which has a population of about 7.5 million, were 1329.

Those numbers were the lowest of any public school system.

In 2017, the Princeton Review, a public policy think tank, released a study that found New Jersey schools have a long-term problem with student dropouts.

The report found that nearly three-quarters of students who enrolled in New Jerseys public schools between 2007 and 2015 didn’t finish high school, with the remainder of the students either graduating from high school or going on to college or other educational programs.

It’s unclear why the dropout rate for New Jersey students has remained stubbornly high, according of the study, which found that the state has one of the highest dropout rates in the country.

The dropout problem has become so pronounced that Princeton Review concluded that the dropouts in New NJ schools should be required to complete a course on the state of the nation before being allowed to return to school.

The state of New Jersey did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

The dropout numbers were a major focus of Governor Chris Christie’s proposed budget for the next fiscal year, which he presented to the state Legislature in early May.

The budget proposal included a provision that would have required students in public schools to complete three-credit courses on the nation’s “Great Recession,” which began in 2007 and was the worst economic downturn in decades.

The $4 billion budget proposal would have reduced the number from 7.8 percent to 5.6 percent of the budget.

But the proposal was shot down by Republican lawmakers, who argued that it would force public schools, especially those with low-income students, to spend millions of dollars on courses that might not be relevant to students with higher incomes.

The state’s school system also is grappling with how to accommodate the increasing numbers of students, especially at Liberty High, which had about 40 percent of students with disabilities in 2016, according the New Jersey Department of Education.

In the past, Liberty High was one of New York’s few publicly funded high schools that didn’t provide financial aid to students who couldn’t afford the cost of attendance.

The new governor, Democrat Phil Murphy, who was elected last November, has proposed eliminating some of the state-funded programs for low- and moderate-income and minority students.

He also wants to create a school choice program for students who don’t attend school in NewJersey.

The program would be modeled after the programs that students in Florida and other states have used to lower the drop-out rates of their schools.

The school system’s problems have also been a major issue in a state where it has struggled to recruit and retain high school graduates.

At Liberty High last year, students were enrolling at a rate of 1.5 percent, the state Department of Community Development data show.

In June, the New York Times reported that the school had dropped the number at Liberty from 10 percent of its students to 8.3 percent.

The New Jersey school district has been unable to keep up with enrollment.